The Mediating Role of Health Perception in the Effect of Trust in Physicians on Treatment Compliance: The Case of Sakarya Province
Methods: The research was conducted in Sakarya Province between 25 October and 30 December 2024, using face-to-face and online surveys. The population included residents aged 18 and over, and the required sample size was 384 at a 95% confidence level. Using convenience sampling, data were obtained from 471 individuals.
Results: The results show that trust in physicians increases treatment compliance while decreasing health perception, with health perception partially mediating this relationship. Treatment compliance depends on trust levels and individuals’ health evaluations. The positive relationship between trust in physicians and treatment adherence (r = 0.527) and its negative relationship with health perception (r = −0.442) confirm both directional effects. This pattern demonstrates the multidimensional nature of patient behaviour. Therefore, effective health communication and strong physician–patient interaction are critical for improving treatment compliance.
Conclusions: Trust in physicians and health perception are key determinants of treatment compliance. The mediating role of health perception indicates its strong effect on transforming trust in physicians into treatment adherence. The study highlights the importance of strengthening trust in physicians and improving individuals' health perceptions through effective communication strategies to enhance treatment compliance.
1. Uyer G. Hemşire-Hasta İletişimi ve İletişimin Hasta Yönünden Önemi [Nurse-Patient Communication and its Importance From Patients' Perspective]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics. 2000;8(2):90-94. [Article in Turkish]
2. Thom DH. Training physicians to increase patient trust. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6(3):245-523. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00249.x.
3. Pearson SD, Raeke LH. Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(7):509-513. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.11002.x.
4. Aybar S, Marşap A. Örgütsel Politika Algısı ile Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisinde Örgütsel Güvenin Düzenleyici Rolünün Belirlenmesine Yönelik İstanbul’daki Üniversitelerde Bir Araştırma [The Moderating Role of Organizational Trust On The Relationship Between Perception of Organizational Politics and Organizational Commitment: Research in Istanbul University]. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;10(2):758-782. doi: 10.20491/isarder.2018.454. [Article in Turkish]
5. Gezergün A, Şahin B, Tengilimoğlu D, Demir C, Bayer E. Hastaların Bakış Açısıyla Hekim-Hasta İlişkisi ve İletişimi; Bir Eğitim Hastanesi Örneği [The Relationship Between Patient and Doctor From The Viewpoint of Patient: A Sample Study of a Training Hospital]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2006;1:129-144. [Article in Turkish]
6. Gülcemal E, Keklik B. Hastaların Hekimlere Duydukları Güveni Etkileyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Isparta İli Örneği1 [An Investigation on Factors Affecting the Confıdence of Patıents to Physicians: A Research in Isparta]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2016;8(14):64-87. doi: 10.20875/sb.66346. [Article in Turkish]
7. Temel K, Aydın M. Sağlık hizmetlerinde, hasta-hekim ilişkisinde yaşanan bilgi asimetrisinin ortaya çıkardığı ekonomik sorunlar: Çanakkale örneği [Economic Problems of Health Aspects in Patient-Physician Relationship The Case of Canakkale]. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi. 2018;21(4):745-765. [Article in Turkish]
8. Okay A. Sağlık iletişimi: Temel Kavramlar ve Prensipler [Health communication: Basic Concepts and Principles]. MediaCat, İstanbul, 2012. [Book in Turkish]
9. Alpar SE, Senturan L, Karabacak U, Sabuncu N. Change in the health promoting lifestyle behaviour of Turkish University nursing students from beginning to end of nurse training. Nurse Educ Pract. 2008;8(6):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.03.010.
10. Klein Velderman M, Crone MR, Wiefferink CH, Reijneveld SA. Identification and management of psychosocial problems among toddlers by preventive child health care professionals. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20(3):332-338. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp169.
11. Glozah FN, Pevalin DJ. Social support, stress, health, and academic success in Ghanaian adolescents: a path analysis. J Adolesc. 2014;37(4):451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.010.
12. Özdemir B, Yıldırım F, Hablemitoğlu Ş. Aktif Yaşlanma İçin Sağlık Okuryazarlığı [Health Literacy for Active Aging]. In: Yıldırım F, Keser A. Editors. Sağlık Okuryazarlığı. Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi; Ankara. 2015: pp. 75-90. [Article in Turkish]
13. Doğan M, Çetinkaya F. Akademisyenlerde Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Düzeyinin Olumlu Sağlık Davranışlarıyla İlişkisi [The Relationship of Health Literacy Level with Positive Health Behaviors in Academicians]. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;28(3):135-141. doi:10.34108/eujhs.492647. [Article in Turkish]
14. Türe Yılmaz AT, Çulha İ, Kersu Ö, Gümüş D, Ünsal A, Köşgeroğlu N. Cerrahi Hastalarının Sağlık Algıları ve Etkileyen Faktörler [Affecting Factors and Health Perceptions Of Surgical Patients]. The Journal of Academic Social Science. 2018; 6(68):89-99. doi:10.16992/asos.13536. [Article in Turkish]
15. Diamond JJ, Becker JA, Arenson CA, Chambers CV, Rosenthal MP. Development of a scale to measure adults’ perceptions of health. J Community Psychol. 2007;35(5):557-561. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20164.
16. Akoğuz Yazıcı N. Lise Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Araştırılması [Investigation of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors of High School Students]. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022;5(Özel Sayı 2):1139-1154. doi: 10.38021/asbid.1195596. [Article in Turkish]
17. Erdoğan ÖN, Araman AO. Health beliefs and functional health literacy; Interaction with the pharmaceutical services. İstanbul Journal of Pharmacy. 2017;47(2):68-71. doi:10.5152/IstanbulJPharm.2017.0011.
18. Kuloğlu Y, Uslu K. Geleceğin Sağlık Çalışanlarında Sağlık Okuryazarlık Düzeyinin Sağlık Algısı Üzerindeki Etkisi [The Impact of Health Literacy on the Perception of Health in the Health Workers of the Future]. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 2022;23(1):255-277. doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.955317. [Article in Turkish]
19. Tarla E.G., Zeylan İ. Sağlık Harcamalarının Ekonomik, Çevresel ve Sosyo-Kültürel Belirleyicilerinin Analizi [Analysis of the Economic, Environmental, and Socio-Cultural Determinants of Health Expenditures]. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi. 2023;1(1):1-15. [Article in Turkish]
20. Ho PM, Bryson CL, Rumsfeld JS. Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation. 2009;119(23):3028-3035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.768986.
21. Demirkol ME, Tamam L. Psikiyatrik Bozukluklarda Tedavi Uyumu [Treatment Adherence in Psychiatric Disorders]. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2016;8(1):85-93 doi:10.18863/pgy.49806.
22. Rahman P, Elder JT. Genetic epidemiology of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii37-39; discussion ii40-1. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030775.
23. Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263-271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61128-3.
24. Unni EJ. Development of models to predict medication non-adherence based on a new typology. Dissertion. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), University of Iowa. Spring 2008. doi: 10.17077/etd.ep3ttkid.
25. Jimmy B, Jose J. Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman Med J. 2011;26(3):155-159. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.38.
26. Gellad WF, Grenard J, McGlynn EA. A Review of Barriers to Medication Adherence: A Framework for Driving Policy Options. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR765.html.
27. Burkhart PV, Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(3):207.
28. Rasiah S, Jaafar S, Yusof S, Ponnudurai G, Chung KPY, Amirthalingam SD. A study of the nature and level of trust between patients and healthcare providers, its dimensions and determinants: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e028061. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028061.
29. Alkan A, Özyıldız KH., Güder M, Balcı B. Medya Araçlarının Kullanımı ile Hekime Güven Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Bir Saha Araştırması: Isparta İli Örneği [A Field Study on the Relationship Between the Use of Media Tools and Trust to Physicians: The Case of Isparta Province]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci. 2022;7(1):233-241. doi: 10.5336/healthsci.2021-81511. [Article in Turkish]
30. Sarıgül SS, Biçer İ, Çakmak C. Birinci Basamak Sağlık Hizmeti Alan Hastalarda Hasta Merkezli İletişim Düzeyinin Sağlık Hizmeti Kullanım Sıklığı ve Hekime Güven Üzerine Etkisi [The Effect of Patient-Centered Communication Level on Frequency of Health Service Use and Trust in Physicians in Patients Receiving Primary Health Care Services]. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2025:18(2);297-313. doi: 10.17218/hititsbd.1545308. [Article in Turkish]
31. Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328-335. doi:10.1177/109019817400200403.
32. Çakmak C, Uğurluoğlu Ö. Hasta Merkezli İletişim ve Hizmet Kalitesi İlişkisi: Hizmet Sunucuya Güvenin Aracı Etkisi [The Relationship Between Patient-Centered Communication and Servıce Quality: The Mediator Effect of Trust in the Service Provider]. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;12(23):93-108. doi:10.53092/duiibfd.1031256. [Article in Turkish]
33. Kıraç R. Hekime Güven ile Hasta Memnuniyeti Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma (Kahramanmaraş İli Örneği) [A Cross-Sectional Study on Trust in Physicians and Patient Satisfaction (The Case of Kahramanmaraş Province)]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2024;23(92):1359-1374. doi: 10.17755/esosder.1479933. [Article in Turkish]
34. Hall MA, Zheng B, Dugan E, et al. Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59(3):293-318. doi: 10.1177/1077558702059003004.
35. Atıcı E. Hasta-Hekim İlişkisini Etkileyen Unsurlar Factors. [Affecting Patient-Physician Relationship]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;33(2):91-96. [Article in Turkish].
36. Temel BB, Şantaş F. Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Arzın Talep Yaratması ve Hekimlere Güven: Hastaların Görüşleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma [Supply-Induced Demand in Healthcare Services and Trust in Physicians: A Research on Patients' Opinions]. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi. March 2024;27(1):91-120. doi:10.61859/hacettepesid.1355604. [Article in Turkish]
37. Güven B, Boztepe Taşkıran H. Sağlık İletişiminde Doktor-Hasta İlişkisi Modelleri ve İlişki Taraflarının Değerlendirmelerini Tespit Etmeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma [Doctor-Patient Relationships Models in Health Communication and a Research to Determine Assessments of Relationship Actors]. Uluslararası Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklam Çalışmaları Dergisi. 2019;2(1):7-38. [Article in Turkish]
38. Deniz S, Çimen M. Hekimlere Güven Düzeyinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma [A Research on Determining the Level of Trust in Physicians]. CBU-SBED. 2020;8(1):10-16. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.656592. [Article in Turkish]
39. Kadıoğlu H, Yıldız A. Sağlık Algısı Ölçeği'nin Türkçe Çevriminin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği [Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Perception of Health Scale]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2012;32(1):47-53. doi: 10.5336/medsci.2010-21761. [Article in Turkish]
40. Deniz S, Akbolat M, Çimen M, Ünal Ö. The Mediating Role of Shared Decision-Making in the Effect of the Patient-Physician Relationship on Compliance With Treatment. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:23743735211018066. doi: 10.1177/23743735211018066.
41. Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Med Care. 1999;37(5):510-517. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010.
42. Birkhäuer J, Gaab J, Kossowsky J, et al. Trust in the health care professional and health outcome: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170988.
43. Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213-220.
44. Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(3):307-316. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013.
45. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21-37.
46. Hittner JB, Swickert R. Sensation seeking and alcohol use: a meta-analytic review. Addict Behav. 2006;31(8):1383-1401. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.11.004.
47. Bailis DS, Segall A, Chipperfield JG. Two views of self-rated general health status. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):203-217. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00020-5.
48. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2001.
Copyright (c) 2025 The European Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Article
- Submitted February 21, 2026
- Published March 14, 2026
- Issue 2026: Online First
- Section Research Article
