Impact of Radial Bowing Alteration on Functional Outcomes Following Locked Intramedullary Nailing of Adult Both-Bone Forearm Fractures
Methods: Twenty-six adult patients who underwent locked IMN for diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures between 2015 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, radiographic measurements, union time, functional scores, and range of motion were recorded. Radial bow magnitude and bow apex location were measured on standardized radiographs and compared between the operated and contralateral forearms. Correlation analyses were performed to evaluate associations between bow changes and functional outcomes.
Results: All fractures achieved union, with no cases of nonunion or radioulnar synostosis. The mean time of union was 10.7±1.8 weeks. Extensor pollicis longus (EPL) rupture occurred in two (7.7%) patients. Postoperative radiographs showed reduced bow magnitude (Δ=0.61±1.13 mm; P=0.010) and a distal shift in bow location (Δ = –5.38±5.39%; P=0.001) on the operated side. A significant negative correlation was found between distal bow displacement and supination (r = –0.561; P=0.003). No correlation was observed with pronation, VAS, or QuickDASH scores.
Conclusions: Locked IMN ensures reliable union and excellent function. While IMN changes radial bowing, only excessive distal displacement impairs supination.
1. Jones DB Jr, Kakar S. Adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: intramedullary nail versus plate fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(7):1216-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.03.020.
2. Azboy I, Demirtas A, Uçar BY, Bulut M, Alemdar C, Ozkul E. Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures. Orthopedics. 2013;36(7):e917-922. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-23.
3. Saikia K, Bhuyan S, Bhattacharya T, Borgohain M, Jitesh P, Ahmed F. Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(5):417-421. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.83762.
4. Uygur E, Özkut A, Akpınar F. Synostosis after fracture of both forearm bones treated by intramedullary nailing. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021;40(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.07.002.
5. Sage FP. Medullary fixation of fractures of the forearm. A study of the medullary canal of the radius and a report of fifty fractures of the radius treated with a prebent triangular nail. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1489-1516.
6. Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. The effect of malunion on functional outcome after plate fixation of fractures of both bones of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(7):1068-1078.
7. Bansal H. Intramedullary fixation of forearm fractures with new locked nail. Indian J Orthop. 2011 Sep;45(5):410-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.83760.
8. Gao H, Luo CF, Zhang CQ, Shi HP, Fan CY, Zen BF. Internal fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm by interlocking intramedullary nail: short-term results in eighteen patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(6):384-391. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000157911.76433.db.
9. Lee YH, Lee SK, Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Kim KH. Interlocking contoured intramedullary nail fixation for selected diaphyseal fractures of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1891-1898. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01636.
10. Polat O, Toy S. Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of plate fixation versus new-generation locked intramedullary nail in the management of adult forearm diaphyseal fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022;56(5):321-326. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2022.21190.
11. Köse A, Aydın A, Ezirmik N, Yıldırım ÖS. A comparison of the treatment results of dpen reduction internal fixation and intramedullary nailing in adult forearm diaphyseal fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017;23(3):235-244. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2016.66267.
12. Box MW, Stegelmann SD, Domingue GA, et al. Intramedullary nail fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05158-0.
13. Zhao L, Wang B, Bai X, Liu Z, Gao H, Li Y. Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing for Both-Bone Forearm Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):722-733. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3753-1.
14. Lari A, Hassan Y, Altammar A, et al. Interlocking intramedullary nail for forearm diaphyseal fractures in adults-A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications. J Orthop Traumatol. 2024;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00761-7.
15. Saka G, Saglam N, Kurtulmuş T, et al. New interlocking intramedullary radius and ulna nails for treating forearm diaphyseal fractures in adults: a retrospective study. Injury. 2014;45 Suppl 1:S16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.040.
16. Yörükoğlu AÇ, Demirkan AF, Akman A, Kitiş A, Usta H. The effects of radial bowing and complications in intramedullary nail fixation of adult forearm fractures. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2017;28(1):30-34. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2017.05.
17. Dave MB, Parmar KD, Sachde BA. The Radial Bow following Square Nailing in Radius and Ulna Shaft Fractures in Adults and its Relation to Disability and Function. Malays Orthop J. 2016;10(2):11-15. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1607.003.
18. Blažević D, Benčić I, Ćuti T, et al. Intramedullary nailing of adult forearm fractures: Results and complications. Injury. 2021;52 Suppl 5:S44-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.012.
19. Ganon S, Bellity J, Zbili D, Boccara D. Reconstruction strategies after rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon: A systematic review. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020;39(6):502-507. doi:10.1016/j.hansur.2020.07.005.
Copyright (c) 2026 The European Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Article
- Submitted February 21, 2026
- Published March 1, 2026
- Issue Volume 12 - Issue 3 (March 2026)
- Section Research Article
