Effect of Active Aspiration Drainage System Use on Postoperative Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
Objective: Postoperative drainage systems are essential for maintaining hemodynamic stability and enabling early detection of complications after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an active suction drainage system applying negative pressure on postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 153 patients who underwent open-heart surgery between August 2023 and August 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the drainage method: active suction drainage (n=69) and conventional drainage (n=84). Postoperative drainage volume, cardiac tamponade, re-exploration for bleeding, mortality, and postoperative complications such as acute kidney injury and wound infection were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess potential confounding factors.
Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, and total operative duration were significantly longer in the active suction group (P=0.007, P=0.009 and P=0.010, respectively), while local hemostatic agent use was higher in the conventional group (P<0.001). Despite these differences, postoperative drainage volume, re-exploration rates, incidence of cardiac tamponade, acute kidney injury, wound infection, and mortality were comparable between groups (all P>0.05). Length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the active suction group. Univariate regression analyses did not identify any independent predictors of re-exploration or cardiac tamponade (P>0.05 for all variables).
Conclusion: Active suction drainage was not associated with significant differences in major postoperative outcomes compared with conventional drainage methods. Although operative variables differed between groups, these factors did not demonstrate an independent effect on clinical outcomes. A numerically higher incidence of cardiac tamponade in the active suction group did not reach statistical significance and should be interpreted cautiously. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted.
1. Biancari F, Mikkola R, Heikkinen J, Lahtinen J, Airaksinen KEJ, Juvonen T. Estimating the risk of complications related to re-exploration for bleeding after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(1):50-55. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.04.023.
2. Karthik S, Grayson AD, McCarron EE, Pullan DM, Desmond MJ. Reexploration for bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery: risk factors, outcomes, and the effect of time delay. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(2):527-534; discussion 534. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.088.
3. Moulton MJ, Creswell LL, Mackey ME, Cox JL, Rosenbloom M. Reexploration for bleeding is a risk factor for adverse outcomes after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111(5):1037-1046. doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70380-x.
4. Despotis GJ, Avidan MS, Hogue CW. Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostatic activation during extracorporeal circulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(5):S1821-1831. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03211-8.
5. Hartstein G, Janssens M. Treatment of excessive mediastinal bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62(6):1951-1954. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(96)00937-x.
6. Unsworth-White MJ, Herriot A, Valencia O, et al. Resternotomy for bleeding after cardiac operation: a marker for increased morbidity and mortality. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59(3):664-667. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(94)00995-3.
7. Sellman M, Intonti MA, Ivert T. Reoperations for bleeding after coronary artery bypass procedures during 25 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11(3):521-527. doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(96)01111-6.
8. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Hayes SN, et al. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of significant pericardial effusions following cardiothoracic surgery and outcomes of echo-guided pericardiocentesis for management: Mayo Clinic experience, 1979-1998. Chest. 1999;116(2):322-331. doi:10.1378/chest.116.2.322.
9. Al-Dadah AS, Guthrie TJ, Pasque MK, Moon MR, Ewald GA, Moazami N. Clinical course and predictors of pericardial effusion following cardiac transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2007;39(5):1589-1592. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.11.014.
10. Russo AM, O’Connor WH, Waxman HL. Atypical presentations and echocardiographic findings in patients with cardiac tamponade occurring early and late after cardiac surgery. Chest. 1993;104(1):71-78. doi:10.1378/chest.104.1.71.
11. Kalisnik JM, Zujs V, Zibert J, et al. The impact of a chest drainage system on retained blood-associated complications after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025;67(Supplement_1):i9-i17. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezaf007.
12. Tamura K, Sakurai S. Clinical efficacy of digital chest drainage system in cardiac valve surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;70(7):619-623. doi:10.1007/s11748-021-01752-9.
13. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-184. doi:10.1159/000339789.
14. Leiva EH, Carreño M, Bucheli FR, Bonfanti AC, Umaña JP, Dennis RJ. Factors associated with delayed cardiac tamponade after cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018;21(2):158-166. doi:10.4103/aca.ACA_147_17.
15. Nasso G, Piancone F, Bonifazi R, et al. Prospective, randomized clinical trial of the FloSeal matrix sealant in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(5):1520-1526. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.014.
16. Fröjd V, Jeppsson A. Reexploration for Bleeding and Its Association With Mortality After Cardiac Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):109-117. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.006.
17. Meszaros K, Fuehrer U, Grogg S, et al. Risk Factors for Sternal Wound Infection After Open Heart Operations Vary According to Type of Operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1418-1425. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.010.
18. Reeves BC, Murphy GJ. Increased mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with red blood cell transfusion after cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21(5):669-673. doi:10.1097/ACO.0b013e32830dd087.
19. Chen QH, Wang HL, Liu L, Shao J, Yu J, Zheng RQ. Effects of restrictive red blood cell transfusion on the prognoses of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):142. doi:10.1186/s13054-018-2062-5.
Copyright (c) 2026 The European Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Research Article
- Submitted March 23, 2026
- Accepted May 9, 2026
- Published May 18, 2026
- Issue 2026: Online First
- Section Research Article
- Categories
