Online ISSN: 2149-3189
2015
Monthly
Nicaea Medical Publishing
Türkiye

Global News Exposure and Perinatal Anxiety in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

Süleyman Güngör, Mehmet Buğrahan Gürcan, Ayşe Rabia Kanbak
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1285
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between global news exposure and perinatal anxiety levels among pregnant women.

Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study included 180 pregnant women. Data were collected via an online questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic characteristics, global news consumption habits, and the Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS). Correlations were assessed using Spearman analysis, and independent predictors were evaluated with multivariate linear regression.

Results: A total of 169 participants were included in the final analysis. The mean PASS score was 34.2±15.8. Significant positive correlations were found between anxiety levels and daily news checking frequency (r=0.172, P=0.025), fear of missing news (r=0.154, P=0.046), repetitive checking behavior (r=0.262, P<0.001), post-exposure tension (r=0.236, P=0.002), and perceived impact of negative news on pregnancy (r=0.343, P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, repetitive checking behavior and perceived negative impact remained independent predictors.

Conclusion: Global news exposure is significantly associated with perinatal anxiety. This relationship appears to be driven more by behavioral and cognitive responses to news rather than exposure duration.

Keywords
Global News, Perinatal Anxiety, Media Exposure, Doomscrolling, Mental Health
References

1. Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. The novel coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychol. 2020;39(5):355-357. doi: 10.1037/hea0000875.

2. Holman EA, Garfin DR, Silver RC. Media's role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(1):93-98. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316265110.

3. Packman C. Book review: the filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. British Politics and Policy at LSE. 2011.

4. Couldry N, Mejias UA. The Costs of Connection: How Data Are Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Social Forces. 2020;99(1):e6. doi:10.1093/sf/soz172.

5. Pfefferbaum B, Newman E, Nelson SD, Nitiéma P, Pfefferbaum RL, Rahman A. Disaster media coverage and psychological outcomes: descriptive findings in the extant research. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(9):464. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0464-x.

6. Gao J, Zheng P, Jia Y, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924.

7. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9.

8. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001.

9. Cinelli M, Quattrociocchi W, Galeazzi A, et al. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16598. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5.

10. Tasnim S, Hossain MM, Mazumder H. Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media. J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(3):171-174. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.20.094.

11. Beck AT, Clark DA. An information processing model of anxiety: automatic and strategic processes. Behav Res Ther. 1997;35(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00069-1.

12. Bendau A, Petzold MB, Pyrkosch L, et al. Correction to: Associations between COVID-19 related media consumption and symptoms of anxiety, depression and COVID-19 related fear in the general population in Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021;271(7):1409. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01290-8.

13. Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014.

14. Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315-323. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179.

15. Fairbrother N, Young AH, Zhang A, Janssen P, Antony MM. The prevalence and incidence of perinatal anxiety disorders among women experiencing a medically complicated pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20(2):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0704-7.

16. Dunkel Schetter C, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25(2):141-148. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680.

17. Lebel C, MacKinnon A, Bagshawe M, Tomfohr-Madsen L, Giesbrecht G. Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.126.

18. Wu Y, Zhang C, Liu H, et al. Perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):240.e1-240.e249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.009.

19. Somerville S, Dedman K, Hagan R, et al. The Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale: development and preliminary validation. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(5):443-454. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0425-8.

20. Samra A, Dryer R. Problematic social media use and psychological distress in pregnancy: The mediating role of social comparisons and body dissatisfaction. J Affect Disord. 2024;361:702-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.057.

21. Caffieri A, Gómez-Gómez I, Barquero-Jimenez C, De-Juan-Iglesias P, Margherita G, Motrico E. Global prevalence of perinatal depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review and meta-analytic synthesis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103(2):210-224. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14740.

22. Weiner S, Wu Y, Kapse K, et al. Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Newborn Brain Development. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(6):e2417924. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17924.

23. Waring ME, McManus-Shipp KE, Field CM, et al. Exposure to and Engagement With Digital Psychoeducational Content and Community Related to Maternal Mental Health by Perinatal Persons and Mothers: Protocol for a Web-Based Survey With Optional Follow-Up. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025;14:e64075. doi: 10.2196/64075.

24. Huddleston R, Julian-Kwong M, Cedars MI, et al. The association between social media for medical information during pregnancy on maternal mental health at the end of the third trimester. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025;28(5):1335-1340. doi: 10.1007/s00737-025-01608-8.

25. Papacharissi Z. Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Inf Commun Soc. 2016;19(3)1-18. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697.

26. Valkenburg PM, Peter J. The differential susceptibility to media effects model. J Commun. 2013;63(2):221-243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024.

There are 26 references in total.
How to Cite
1.
Güngör S, Gürcan MB, Kanbak AR. Global News Exposure and Perinatal Anxiety in Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eur Res J. Published online May 16, 2026:1-8. doi:10.18621/eurj.1285
License
Creative Commons License

Copyright (c) 2026 The European Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

2026: Online First

Article Information

  • File Downloads 5
  • Abstract Views 15
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.